What now?

I have just clicked the button to turn in my final paper, of my final grade class…ever!

I’ve been in grad school for the last 3 years.  I started when I was pregnant with my youngest child, and her 3rd birthday is this weekend.  My family has missed me.  Has it been worth it?  Yes, absolutely!  I will now have a Masters degree in not one, but two academic areas.  I’m pretty proud of that.  Especially being an Alaska Native woman and having the privilege of working with Alaska Native students; I present them with a heck of a role model.

So what will I be doing next?  First, I need to decondition myself from this ridiculous habit of multi-tasking.  Based on necessity for survival, I developed an extreme habit of multi-tasking.  I’m a jack of all trades, but the master of none, so to speak.  I can’t remember the last time I just sat down and goofed off with my family.  There’s always something needing to get done.  This will probably be the hardest habit for me to break, but certainly worth the challenge.

I’m looking forward to having hobbies again.  I’ll just be assigning the homework and grading it from now on.  While I am a good student, I’ve been over homework for sometime now.  I miss being able to read just for the fun of it.

And as far as the future… well I have no idea.  The grant for my program where I teach runs out this year.  It’s promising that the local school district is considering funding us through the next school year in hopes that we can land another grant.  There’s certainly no security in that, but surprisingly I’m at peace with it for the time being.  I’ve done the best I can and my students are thriving.  I’ve also really enjoyed a chance to reconnect with my cultural roots.  I am crazy excited about Never Alone and am going to look seriously into the Cook Inlet Organization and see about getting involved with more educational gaming and creating culturally Alaskan games.

This has been an amazing journey.  I’ve met some incredible people and really pushed myself further than I ever expected.  The greatest thing about it, is while I may be closing this one chapter of my life, the adventure isn’t quite over.  There’s so much out there to try, explore, and conquer.  Game on, everyone!  Enjoy the adventure!

BTW– “Zombies, Run!” is one of the most incurable games I have ever played.  If you hate working out, I HIGHLY recommend this game!

Recommendations for Future Open Gaming

This is a segment from my final paper of my final grad school class.  I suppose the hardest part to deal with besides the amount of time committed to pulling off this ginormous project was the feeling of not being heard.  In my own small way, I can shoot my thoughts off into cyberspace and perhaps be validated in some way.  Or maybe not.  The point is, I’m did the best I possibly could, and I have no regrets about that.

This was by far the largest open classroom experience that I had ever been part of. While is was a successful experience, there are a number of things I noted that could possibly improve future events:

• Create more instructional videos for teachers. In this day and age, when we have the ability to pad our schedules down to the minutes, teachers have very little time to read through instructions. It doesn’t fit with the NetGener understanding. We don’t read instructions. We jump in and figure things out. However, when you are looking for a specific outcome or product, this idea will become lost in lengthy, written instructions. For our experience, 3 pages of instructions were created. This is on top of written lesson plans and rubrics. Granted, we the game developers did our part and made the information available. However, as coaches, we weren’t conducive to the teachers’ time—especially for a game. A series of quick videos would have streamlined this process. Not only would this have made the process more easily implemented, but it also would eliminate the anonymity of the game developers. We are people too. We are not faceless. We have feelings just like the students, and therefore, are worthy of respect as if we were within the same classroom of the students.
• Create a Google Community as opposed to a Google Group for coordination. There were far too many emails in this process. On top of reading through lengthy instructions, the teachers were constantly inundated with mass emails. As a developer AND a teacher, I had double the load. Information easily got lost. However, in a Google Community, like Facebook, I would have easily been able to find a specific thread and followed the comments and information pertaining to said thread. It bogs down the communication much less.
• Among the game developers, there must be transparency of information, and never assume that you understand what someone else is saying and take action—explain it back to them to make sure. This impulsiveness happened a lot during this process, and I felt so disrespected. It was extremely frustrating! I don’t believe that it was too much a generational thing, because I wasn’t that far in age to a lot of my peers. But I did sense a lack of listening. Had we been sitting in the same classroom, my peers would have easily been able to read my body language. Online, there isn’t always that luxury. Speaking one at a time like a walky-talky and not always being “done up” so that you can stand looking at yourself on the webcam eliminated a lot of social cues. Many times, I would explain my understanding of a situation and sometimes solutions. We would come to a consensus. Then, when we would next meet, I would find that the plan had changed and it was nothing that I thought we had talked about. Again, extremely frustrating with a sense of disrespect—we didn’t respect you enough to fully listen. I know NO ONE in this group ever meant it that way! But especially near the end, when this kept happening, I had to coach myself that misunderstanding was not the same as disrespect or ingratitude. I was very quite at the beginning of this project, because I was getting a feel for people and I didn’t want to just bulldoze my way through. As my frustrations mounted near the end, and I started to step forward to make myself heard, especially since we were running out of time, I sensed that people were taking more of an offense at my abruptness. I was suddenly the Debby-downer. And that’s probably a good assessment. I got very burned out just trying to do what should have been the simple things. But there was very little consideration as to how I got that way. A good coach does very little of the talking. They ask, “Why?” and listen, more than anything.
• Keep the game simple. It may be chaotic, but that’s the students we’re teaching. THEY are chaotic. They are unique. And they love it that way. By instituting less restrictions and boundaries, we are allowing the experience to be more student-led. Scenario 1 was so rigid in its emergence, and granted, a lot of classrooms didn’t appear properly prepared for the experience. We, the game developers and monitors, did way too much policing. That should never be the case. It should be low cost to the teachers, higher cost to the students. That’s teaching 101. Also, for personal well-being, the creation of the game itself should be simple. No one appreciates the necessary step of “experience grinding.” “Experience grinding” is the tedious task, often seen in RPG’s, where you walk around and kill monsters in order to gain enough experience to level up or get gold. It’s boring! In Minecraft development, my “experience grinding” was flattening and discoloring zones. It was a long, tedious process… and looked like nothing. It even sounds unimpressive. “What did you do in the game?” “I created giant gaps and took the color out.” Right. You sound like someone who knows what they’re doing. Was it necessary? According to the group planning, yes. But don’t be looking for any pats on the back. And the students are just going to completely destroy what took you so long to create—because you created it for them. So future game builders, develop a thicker skin than myself and be okay with the ultimate demise of your hard work.
• Encourage education of digital citizenship. This experience very much brought to mind Jason Ohler’s teachings on digital citizenship. Unsupervised adolescents online will crush your soul! And there’s a reason for this. These students often don’t feel secure in themselves, but the anonymity online makes them bold. This boldness and sense of superiority can make them mean. Not all, but enough to ruin an experience for everyone. Within schools, there needs to be a move to educate students how to navigate the Internet safely and how to properly contribute to a global society. This type of activity is a great practice ground, but as game developers and monitors, we need to coach teachers in how to go about doing this. We don’t just give teens the key to the car because they can drive the vehicle. We ride along with them to make sure they learn the rules of the road too. If you don’t, people get hurt. The exact same idea applies online.
• More teacher coaching is needed. In the explosion of this project, one of our main purposes got lost. There just wasn’t time for it, and the project grew so big that there was no possible to way to build rapport with teachers. Writing instruction manuals doesn’t accomplish this. Making videos doesn’t accomplish this. It would have been nice, especially with teachers who weren’t comfortable with the tech but were still willing to try, if we could have been better aides in developing their understanding and building their confidence. To help them see the value of gaming in the classroom, so that they could have another tool to engage their students in their own way.
• Partnering with the students is valuable. Too often the idea of reciprocal teaching is neglected. Students have so much to share with us! And they really do stay more on task when they feel they are genuine, contributing members. During the course of the experience, students I ran into who were chronic “trouble makers” often turned into valuable partners when they had something they could do to help. Could they help teach someone else who was struggling? Could they build something I didn’t have time to assemble? Would their actions reflect favorably on gaming and help institute regular gaming in the classroom? In one incident during Scenario 2, a number of students from the same class kept saying, “We don’t know what we’re supposed to do!” I asked them if they had seen the instructional video I created. They said they hadn’t. I gave them a quick summary of the objective, and then directed them to respectfully ask their teacher to share the video with them. The next day, I came across the same students and they said, “Hey AdminTiffany! We saw you in the video! It really helped!” Student partners can be extremely helpful in accomplishing what you set out to do.
• Teachers working within same zones should collaborate together. I wish I had implemented this with my class, but I just ran out of time and thought capacity. I did hear that other teachers planned together and came up with a beautiful layout for their Community. Teachers working together, knowing what to expect from each other and their students, would go far to reduce frustrations. My students were prepared to work potentially with students who were much younger than themselves. However, those other students didn’t even respond to their requests for cooperation. I believe that if I had contacted the other teachers it would have been a much more collaborative experience.
• Partner with teachers as monitors. I know that there are already plans to make this happen, and I am glad for it. We’re not babysitters—we’re grad students. We are here to work with teachers. But if the teachers aren’t there to work with, there’s very little we can do to stem the tide of adolescent angst.
• Be aware of the time frame. We implemented this around Thanksgiving and into the beginning of December. This is the most crazy holiday season. Not that we had much choice, based on when our semester took place, but it really did add to the chaos. We were also the trailblazers, so for upcoming classes who will be creating something new, they won’t have the same challenges we’ve already endured. Also, establishing a secure enough system so that students can game in their own time would be helpful. 5 hours of Minecraft a week is nothing at all in the gaming world. If they are really engaged, they will want more. And if gaming is taking place at home, more writing and academics can take place during the limited school time. Limiting the number of students will aide to this security too. Within 4 days of advertising, we had 2000+ students trying to register for this event. That’s way too many. Set a cap, and stick with it. You can expand as you get more secure with yourself.
• We’re grad students first, game developers second. Again, we’ve never done this before. We just didn’t know what to expect. But there was a time when I completely forgot what I was doing this for. I’m glad I had the experience. I’ve always wanted to get into game development. But game developers spend a majority of their time doing their job. We still had work, family lives, blogging, literature reviews, and everything else. It just turned into too much. I know some of my peers were in a much more strenuous situations than I was. Not to mention, game developers generally get paid, because game developing is their job. However, the fact that our names were associated with this project pushed us to not want to create an inferior product—especially since it was going out to the global community. So that meant long, extra hours that we took away from our families… for… pride? It sounds harsh, but that is kind of what it boils down to. I bought my entire family the “I survived Givercraft,” shirts because they did. They survived crazy mommy spending tons of time so that she felt like she fully contributed to a game for others.
• This project needs to be near the end of the program. There are so many facets called for in this type of project that grad students should be prepared for before they start this. I would recommend that this type of class only be offered to those who are near the end of their Ed. Tech degree. This calls for leadership skills (coaching), digital citizenship, and a familiarity with working with various tech. I was originally part of a second team that was going to create a different game. However, my 2 groupmates dropped out of the class. It could be for other reasons, but I do know that at least one person was extremely intimidated by the tech.

Students to Partners

Time is just falling into some kind of crazy vortex. I’m getting to the point where I can’t even tell time any more. While I am very happy that this project is going well, I will be even more ecstatic when it’s over.

This week I’ve been getting the rest of my ducks in a row. I got my students set up with wikispaces; we changed the IP addresses; and got usernames established. I did have a rather interesting incident. I went over the Greifing agreement with my students. Some of them were already planning on building traps and other magnificent creations. However, when I explained to them exactly how the game was to go and how they would be graded, I caught their attention. When I told them that this project was a big deal because so many in the educational community would be watching, they became partners. I explained that because they were high schoolers, I would be expecting them to be mature, helpful, and tactful.

When we re-entered the Givercraft world, we were initially in Zone 10. However, due to registration changes, I knew we were no longer going to be in that zone. I had instructed them all to go to my specifically created test zone. However, I began hearing comments, “Hmmm… I see color. I must fix this.” …. …. …. … I REALLY wished I had partnered with them months ago! We could have cranked out those zones in no time! I was very impressed that my students went from showing off their initial prowess to readying themselves to be teachers and partners.

So I am looking forward to FINALLY playing the game with my students this week. It’s going to be an great experience, and I’m really interested to see the results.

The time is drawing nigh…

I keep trying to tell myself that things are going to slow down as soon as I get over this last hill… but that is very rarely the case.  This week has be complicated by traveling spouses; sick children; power outages; and crazy work schedules.  Also, we’re getting into the full swing of the holiday season, so I KNOW things are just going to continue in their craziness.

For Givercraft this week, I’ve mostly been spending my time preparing my class for the project.  It’s been confusing being a developer of the module and a participating teacher.  There’s a ton of emails!  And it was difficult for me to differentiate which message belonged to which role (Tiffany vs Mrs. Pickrell).  I managed to get ahold of some sort of organization and did the following: downloaded the correct java on all class computers; downloaded the client on all class computers; set up student wikis; made huge strides in the reading of the The Giver; started having my student document which buildings were discussed in which chapter; and tested my students’ access to the Givercraft world.

My beta testing with students revealed that I may need to hash a few more things out.  I had some students getting kicked off the server pretty quickly.  I’m not certain if it’s a bandwidth issue, or a server one.  I also turned on almost all the world options in survival mode, just to see how crazy we could get it.  It was pretty insane.  Again, more students were getting kicked out and the game froze on some of us for a little while.  I may take them in for another beta testing session, but this time I’ll keep the monsters off and no fire.

I also participated in the teacher testing challenge.  However, I didn’t really feel there was too much for me to contribute.  Everyone else was doing such a fantastic job tutoring others!  It was also good that I stayed out of it, as I will most likely be spending most of my energies with my class and just the occasional time slot.  So how did I best spend my time?  Well… I goofed off.  But it was good!  I was introduced to some amazing Minecraft builders!  I never really do much with redstone, because I don’t really understand the mechanics of it.  However, after some of the cool stuff I saw, I might be willing to learn.  I eventually spent some of that time creating memory chests.

What I have left to do:

The memory chests need to be created, and I could use some help with that.  Thomas has created the house of memories behind the HUB.  I’ve already created a couple of chests labeled: “Snow” and “Happy Birthday.”  Inside is a book with a task– “Create a memory using snow!” With some items to help them create such a memory (because they will NOT be in creative mode when they get this) and also in the book is a writing prompt– “Why do you think the community got rid of snow?”  More chests would be greatly appreciated.  We can make a memory of just about anything that The Community got rid of– holidays, sailing, animals, hills, etc.

I’m also still finishing up the rivers.  I had a startling revelation as I was reading through The Giver– I put the rivers in the wrong spot.  Or mostly, I didn’t leave enough space for construction on the other side of the river, like it says in the book.  I was telling Lee and Thomas the other day and I wish I had had someone like Lori working with me, because her precise attention to detail would have saved me a lot of trouble.  But it is what it is.  I’m sure the students will adjust. And those who notice, well, that just means they’re reading their books and good for them!

This week’s summary

1. What have I done this week?

Honestly, this week has been a bit of a living nightmare. Mostly due to personal stuff going on, but the stress of so many dealings has literally driven me to illness. Our project that was to accommodate a “simple” 100 students has increased exponentially. As a builder for the GiverCraft setting, I was building zones according to a formulated plan for first 100, then 400, then 800. Within a matter of days, we had 2000 registered for our little project. While this is exciting in the educational standpoint, it’s incredibly intimidating as a developer of the game. Looking at a very short time frame and constantly shifting variables, it was difficult to know what exactly to do.

Utilizing World Edit to prepare Minecraftedu is a simple enough task, provided you have the know-how, but it is tedious. Especially when you don’t have specific parameters to follow. I developed a system of flattening the landscape, turning the world “colorless” (per “The Giver), and filling in the holes; but it was only through great trial and error. Possibly, the most frustrating was when I would forget to take the “fill/dig” option off and inadvertently destroying much of what I had just created.

So this week I have been building—building, building, building. Rebuilding the hub, modifying preexisting zones, rebuilding zones, and creating an additional 22 zones. A highlight was one of our beta testers commenting on how our world editing skills have improved.

2. How do I feel about my progress?

As far as general building goes, I feel like I kicked butt! However, at the prospect of accommodating for 2000+ students… I still don’t feel like it’s enough. I don’t necessarily know how to change it, except possibly building more zones. However, the common consensus seems to be that 25 zones is more than enough. I just worry that the students won’t have enough room to do what we’re asking of them. Or that they will be so close to each other that inadvertent destruction happens to each other.

3. What do I still need to do?

I still need to go through and build the rivers in each zone. Again, this is doable, but very tedious. Not to mention, working with the water option is tricky (I keep flooding everything).

4. How can others help?

Lori has already been a huge help! By taking my literature review portion, which I was feeling extremely overwhelmed with, she freed me up from a huge burden! I am having a very difficult time following our emailing system of communication. There’s just so much to read! And when life picks up (which it has) there’s a just a storm of chaos to weather. I still don’t feel like I have my bearings. The variables keep changing every time I look up. But I also don’t want to be the one who drops the ball on such a huge, and ever developing project.

Week 7 (?) Reflection

I’m writing this a little late, because my Sunday was CRAZY!!!

I have the great honor of escorting my awesome students to the Elders & Youth Conference as well as AFN.  We got in late last night.  Then we’ve had meeting after meeting.  There has been very little time for anything else!  In reflection of this last week, it has been a growing experience.  What started as a simple homework operating session turned into an enormous expansion of my Professional Learning Network!  I am really excited about working with people from literally all over the globe on this project!

Even though this didn’t happen this week, I did want to share this uber-cool moment today.  At the expo here at the Elders and Youth conference had a demo for “Never Alone,” a video game that depicts Inupiaq culture as a mainstream video game.  I am blown away by this game!  It’s beautiful; prioritizes problem-solving over violence; and is narrated in Native Inupiaq language!  As I’m listening to Elders bemoan the loss of their languages, I just see so much promise in a game like this!  I told the developers I couldn’t wait to see a Southeast version of this game!  They said they’ve been asked a lot about sequels already.  But of course, this game needed to be successful first.  So I am passing it around my PLN!  This is a GREAT game!!!  Please share and get a conversation going around it!  This could be a modern means of preserving Native cultures that are fading away!  Possibly even revitalizing it!

Nailing Down the Components of Gamification

Gotta strike that perfect balance!

This week has been full of game designing– both lesson plan wise and also within the actual game of Minecraftedu.  I will say, that picking up Worldedit again has been crazy fun!  Yes, so what if I sing “Let it Go” as I cover the Minecraft-scape with snow! It’s cool! (See what I did there? *tee hee*)  Developing the actual game for our module has been tasking and it has given me a greater appreciation for those who actually develop games.  It takes me hours to reformat something that someone else has already created.  So the next time I play a game that I beat within 20 hours, I’m not going to complain; because it probably took the developers months (maybe years) to develop that game time!  However, I firmly believe that putting the time into developing is well worth the effort, as the modern student is used to a particular quality within their game.  If I put a half-effort into my creation, they will model that same level of effort.  I want the most out of my students.

The lesson planning themselves have also been interesting in their development.  This is my first time working, what is essentially, a full-time job and doing grad school.  I have nothing but respect for those who have been doing this all the long!  We’ve been utilizing an emailing system to communicate across our development group.  However, I’m finding that by the time I get off work and can actually turn my grad student brain on, I have about 15 emails to work my way through.  Things get jumbled, or even lost, and I feel like I’ve let my team down because I’m not as on top of it all as I like to be.  However, things are coming together; and I’m very proud of the hard work that the rest of my team is putting into this project.

I’ve been modifying the Task for our second week of this module, making sure that it has a solid link to a Common Core Standard.  The biggest challenge in the course is making sure that the task captures the main components of gamification.  Is the task challenging enough, yet obtainable?  Does it allow for an experience of consequences without real-life ramifications?  Will it be engaging?  Does it lead the students to the mastery of the objective, or is it just busy work?  I feel that we’re just about there, and it’s exciting!

Speaking of excitement, I’m really looking forward to how this GiverCraft Language expansion is going to turn out.  If all goes as planned, we will have Literacy students learning some Japanese words from Language students.  And, in tandem, Language students teaching Japanese words to Literacy students.  I’m a strong believer in that you learn better when you teach something.  With students crossing Minecraft cultures and trading, I think we present a unique environment for this learning to take place.  Fingers crossed!

References

Extra Credits. Gamification. Accessed on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dLK9MW-9sY

Week 5 Reflection

I’m super glad we got the grant for our project! Yay! While reviewing the video that Lee posted summarizing our project, one statement stuck with me—but in a good way! Lee expressed, “So, Tiffany goes overboard sometimes…” (She did finish, “but this is great!”). At first, I thought, “Oh shoot. I do don’t I?” But then immediately I thought, “Yeah! I sure did! Because I CAN!” Had I been doing a project like writing, crafting, or creating a different type of product, I would have been greatly limited by resources, time and stamina. But by using a vehicle like Minecraft, I was able to just keep going.

On the other hand though, it is a little disconcerting to look up from your game and see that 3-4 hours has passed already…

But I’ve also done that with other projects and gotten far less compelling results. It does help that I’m pretty familiar with Minecraft, so it does help with carrying out what’s in my head. But I also like the ability to work with my teammate pretty freely. Amanda built a great library, and it was fun to work together on our garden. And then, after we completed our product, others could actually visit our work. I was able to ride my horse over and check out the German Governmentalists’ institutions. They were very colorful, and very creepy when you’re aware of their intent. But it was great! It was also fun to have the onsite competition and “trash talking”. Lori cheering on her genetically-modified pigmen and Thomas trying to convince Amanda and I that we needed new men in our lives.

So I really enjoyed the challenge this week. It was a great experience and I’m looking forward to presenting a similar experience for some students!

Post-WWI Germany in Minecraft? YES!

This week were challenged to take on the role of two different factions within the setting of post World War I. It was the German Governmentalists versus the Women’s Advocates. The Governmentalists were promoting women to re-marry and immediately begin breeding Aryan babies. The Women’s Advocates were focused more on women becoming independent; and empowered to work for the good of their country.

I will admit, at the beginning of this challenge, it did seem a little daunting. We were given a goal, but not specific instructions in how to accomplish that. But once I got past the initial scare, I realized that the openness was actually a gift. By using the guideline… I could do anything! By putting myself within a role to play, it was a really fun experience. What would I do if I were a woman striving for self-sufficiency? I was having fun building a whole back-story.

While grieving for my dead, war hero husband, Volfgang, my character decided to move on with her life. By first developing the iron mine that has been in her family for years, she took those resources and helped build a haven for ALL looking to work—women, men, and families. All was for the greater good and rebuilding a distraught nation… like my character.

With my fellow widow, Amanda, we built the “Always Strong” village—complete with university, barracks, produce garden, horses to train, cows to butcher and milk, pigs for butchering, chickens to raise, sheep to sheer, lumber to chop, and a mine shaft. That looks like a pretty self-sufficient village to me! I found myself REALLY wanting to play this village on survival mode, because we would have been amazing!

If I were to come away from this experience, and write a paper about the struggle of women during this time in history, I could probably produce something incredible. My perspective would be much more inclusive than compared to if I were just to read the text and write. It’s one thing to theorize how gamification works, but to actually experience it was really neat. Not to mention, a lot more fun!

Perspective– Silly vs Valuable

I used this video in my portfolio over the summer, and I’m finding that the “Baby Boomer” perspective isn’t just limited to an age group.  What I’m learning a lot from this week, mostly in my local setting, is that perspective influences so much– especially in how we respond to people.

I’m finding that just because I don’t understand something, it’s not stupid.  For example, I’m not much of a Pokemon fan, but a lot of my students are.  When they ramble on about the various categories of Pokemon, I am completely lost.  However, I still listen, because it’s something they’ve dedicated time to.  Was it a waste of their time?  From the perspective of possible employability– probably.  However, I can respect that they’ve developed a specialist language in order to more easily communicate.  Can I take that interest and turn that into learning– absolutely!  Tons of literacy I can use there!  I don’t necessarily consider myself the most creative of educators, but I do try to keep a good perspective and grab a learning opportunity when it presents itself.

I’ve also found how incredibly anti-social something so readily acceptable like reading can be.  I know.  Believe me, it hurst to say it.  Especially since I’m a Reading Specialist.  But as I’ve been catching up on reading, I realize I’m spending hours not talking to anyone, and that’s difficult with toddlers.  When I’m reading a common book with people, we have TONS to talk about… after we’ve read.  However, when my husband is sitting in the living room gaming, I can see right there exactly what he’s doing.  We discuss it.  We strategize together.  We look up wiki’s when we get lost.  We problem solve together.  This isn’t saying there’s a wrongness to reading.  Of course not!  I am inviting and examining of what’s considered “Acceptable” learning practices and why.